From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11268 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2011 15:39:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 11259 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2011 15:39:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:38:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8CFcob5023423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:38:50 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8CFcntv027526; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:38:50 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-154.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.154]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8CFcmeT008529; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:38:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4E6E2785.5080003@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:17:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Henderson Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20110912151833.GG2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110912151833.GG2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 On 09/12/2011 09:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to ping two patches of mine: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg02385.html > - PR rtl-optimization/50212 > fix EH ICE with -freorder-blocks-and-partition Seems OK. Though I did wonder why we were deleting the label and whether or not that was an indication that there was another suitable label in the insn stream that should be used instead. Assuming you verified that is not the case, then this patch is OK. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00386.html > - PR debug/50299 > addition original argument mode to > CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE to fix up call site debug info OK jeff