public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [ARM] Fix PR49641
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9C2586.7080804@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E983996.4030908@codesourcery.com>

On 14/10/11 14:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/13/11 16:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> 	* config/arm/arm.c (store_multiple_sequence): Avoid cases where
>>> 	the base reg is stored iff compiling for Thumb1.
>>>
>>> 	* gcc.target/arm/pr49641.c: New test.
> 
> Ping.  Richard, you replied to the mail but didn't comment on the patch.
> 
> 
> Bernd
> 


Sorry, I thought I'd made it clear that I don't think the compiler
should ever use STM with write-back if the base register is in the
stored list.  We must certainly never do it if the base register is not
the first register in the list as this has always been unpredictable.

BTW, this is not Thumb1 specific, it applies at all times.


So, no the patch is not OK as it stands.

R.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-17 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-07 20:08 Bernd Schmidt
2011-07-13 14:31 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-10-14 13:57   ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-10-17 13:34     ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2011-10-18 12:26       ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-10-18 12:59         ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-10-18 14:24           ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-10-18 14:26             ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-10-24 14:00               ` Sebastian Huber
2011-10-25 17:52                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-10-31 11:53                   ` Sebastian Huber
2011-11-08  8:35                     ` Sebastian Huber
2011-11-16 10:41                       ` Sebastian Huber
2011-11-16 19:05                         ` Richard Earnshaw
     [not found] ` <4E1DA543.4030000@arm.com>
2011-07-25 17:00   ` Bernd Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9C2586.7080804@arm.com \
    --to=rearnsha@arm.com \
    --cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=bernds@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).