From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-305604-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5916 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2011 20:36:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 5763 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2011 20:36:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (HELO rcsinet15.oracle.com) (148.87.113.117)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:36:05 +0000
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94])	by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p9QKa3Wr001207	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:36:04 GMT
Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157])	by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9QKa2Jp017896	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:36:03 GMT
Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66])	by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p9QKZvmY030792;	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:35:57 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.51.11.135)	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)	with ESMTP ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:35:57 -0700
Message-ID: <4EA86F27.4020907@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:16:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch / RFC] PR 50864
References: <4EA867B7.7050406@oracle.com> <4EA86CD1.6090507@redhat.com> <4EA86DF0.7060709@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA86DF0.7060709@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg02402.txt.bz2

On 10/26/2011 10:30 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>> At a glance, it looks too early; it's valid to have 
>> namespace-qualified names after ->.
>>
>> namespace A
>> {
>>   struct B
>>   {
>>     int i;
>>   };
>> };
>>
>> A::B* b;
>> int i = b->A::B::i;
> I was also trying to construct such kind of example myself... but my 
> patch does not regress on the testcase you wrote down. I can tell you 
> exactly why, if you like..
We have that parser->scope is a RECORD_TYPE and postfix_expression is an 
INDIRECT_REF.

Paolo.