From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-306573-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6284 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2011 23:41:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 6276 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2011 23:41:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:40:59 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA3NewZR021745	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:40:58 -0400
Received: from houston.quesejoda.com (vpn-236-154.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.236.154])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA3Newdx026637;	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:40:58 -0400
Message-ID: <4EB32689.6000603@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:50:00 -0000
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
CC: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [trans-mem] XFAIL known failures
References: <4EB311BD.3040908@redhat.com> <CA+=Sn1mR0MUp5T1OY4jWp_QDLaqx=j2D-k0GCjkB7TpU1u6erw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Sn1mR0MUp5T1OY4jWp_QDLaqx=j2D-k0GCjkB7TpU1u6erw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2

On 11/03/11 18:30, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Aldy Hernandez<aldyh@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> These are known failures, mostly missed optimizations.  XFAILing them.
>
> I think you should file a bug about each missed optimization and
> reference the bug # in the testcase.  This is so we don't lose track
> of the missed optimizations.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski

Sure, I can do that.

What do you suggest, a bug report per failure with nothing but the 
directory/name of the test?

Do you mind if I do this after the merge (if it gets approved)?  I'm 
trying to concentrate on merge blockers.

Thanks.