From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: cxx-mem-model merge [6 of 9] - libstdc++-v3
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB42B8E.2010907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB328D7.9010309@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/11 17:50, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> These are the changes to libstdc++ to make use of the new atomics.
> I changed the files to use the new atomics, and bkoz did a
> shuffling of the include file layout to better suit the new c++
> approach.
>
> previously, libstdc++ provided a locked implementation in
> atomic_0.h with the theory that eventually it would be used. The
> new scheme involves leaving non-lock-free implementations to an
> external library. This involved removing the old lock
> implementation and restructuring things now that multiple
> implementation dont have to be supported. SO a lot fo this is
> churn... 2 include files deleted and one merged into another one..
Is there an ABI/API impact to all this churn? Or was the atomic_0.h
stuff never used? Was it an exposed API or strictly internal? I get
the impression that is_lock_free wasn't ever defined, which is
probably good in this context.
Given these are primarily Benjamin's changes, I'm going to defer to
his wisdom :-) If he doesn't chime in, ping him directly.
jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOtCuOAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7M34H/2B9f1DsPE9oK5DfvHYyclxZ
hvFGlSnw5r9q7UGsWrCGDd/J4mmkXOJMHMfpzjowuWUYUYDNZ5b2FuZ9fMij2K5f
wJOfN9wslWTNyafJb/hjVMEzy1dmCUB2YV4N0e5cy39lvfWfNzM/9EfYbz5UEQpO
VCODtS0WbsSUTkt7HeDkD7U21mpSsn1fGx4gBJyBpODihIq7Qk4uFqGtvrKGve26
7Pi3aP64TQl3zwF2lAkOV4KgzPLQUv4RIWOiYuyzEf13XpfJivWPLTUkJqJka+lp
8W+LFOLl3ygnNUAe9ugwRNCE+agfHG+Hp7+l8ypCpWSsrBwJB8m7rY1sMDA2HJw=
=E/Sj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-04 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-03 23:52 Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-04 18:17 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2011-11-04 18:53 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-07 0:54 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-07 4:48 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-07 11:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-07 14:41 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-07 14:56 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-07 15:38 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-07 16:28 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-11-07 17:24 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-07 17:43 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-07 18:27 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-08 6:45 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-08 13:43 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-11 17:49 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2011-11-11 17:56 ` Andrew MacLeod
2011-11-11 21:07 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-11 23:34 ` Torvald Riegel
2011-11-11 20:27 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-07 16:32 ` Richard Henderson
2011-11-08 20:22 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB42B8E.2010907@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).