On 11/07/2011 10:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 04:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> We have that parser->scope is a RECORD_TYPE and postfix_expression is an
>> INDIRECT_REF.
> Ah, OK.  I guess we swallow up the namespace while parsing the full 
> nested-name-specifier and it isn't a problem.  So I think handling 
> this here should be OK.  But why check for ARROW_EXPR?  Can't you 
> construct a similar testcase using .?
Ah, very good. I'll investigate that. In the meanwhile I'm applying the 
below when testing finishes, which indeed, cannot hurt, the code ends-up 
being a bit cleaner.
> I'll deal with 50870.
Excellent.

Paolo.

///////////////////////