From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22829 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2011 00:52:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 22819 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2011 00:52:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (HELO acsinet15.oracle.com) (141.146.126.227) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:51:49 +0000 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pA80pllj013823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 00:51:48 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA80plkB009862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 00:51:47 GMT Received: from abhmt112.oracle.com (abhmt112.oracle.com [141.146.116.64]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pA80pfY8011107; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:51:41 -0600 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.56.218.51) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:51:41 -0800 Message-ID: <4EB87D11.7050908@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:22:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Merrill CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50864 (parser bits) References: <4EB87866.80303@oracle.com> <4EB87CA3.9090200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4EB87CA3.9090200@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01116.txt.bz2 On 11/08/2011 01:49 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 11/07/2011 07:31 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> + if (TREE_CODE (parser->scope) == NAMESPACE_DECL >> + && (TREE_CODE (postfix_expression) == ARROW_EXPR >> + || TREE_CODE (postfix_expression) == CALL_EXPR)) > > Do we need to check the code of postfix_expression at all? Ah! You implied that, in your previous message, but seemed too nice to me ;) Let me regtest without... Paolo.