From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5367 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2011 18:17:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 5358 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2011 18:17:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:16:53 +0000 Received: by wwf27 with SMTP id 27so1011372wwf.8 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.80.39 with SMTP id j39mr2359994wee.61.1320776212345; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p16sm2597825wbn.14.2011.11.08.10.16.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:16:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EB97203.2020209@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:22:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer CC: Richard Guenther , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [4.5.1,PR42776] Backport LTO-COFF implementation. References: <4C12F96F.20108@gmail.com> <4C16219E.5060405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01221.txt.bz2 On 30/10/2011 21:30, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Dave Korn wrote: >> * htdocs/gcc-4.5/changes.html: Remove explicit mentions of ELF >> format from LTO documentation. > > Ouch, I noticed this patch of yours never was applied, perhaps > some misunderstanding between Richi and you (him assuming you'd > go ahead and you waiting for his approval)? > > The patch still applies and looks good to me, so I went ahead and > applied it on your behalf. Oh, I don't remember quite how it slipped through the cracks there, but thanks for finding it and applying it for us! cheers, DaveK