From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-311668-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3153 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2012 20:53:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 3134 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2012 20:53:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:52:58 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0JKqwIN019306	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:52:58 -0500
Received: from toll.yyz.redhat.com (unused [10.15.16.165] (may be forged))	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0JKqvJN007325;	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:52:57 -0500
Message-ID: <4F1882A9.2090408@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:53:00 -0000
From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor.zamyatin@intel.com>
CC: Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin@gmail.com>,        "enkovich.gnu@gmail.com" <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>,        "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: FW: patch to fix PR21617
References: <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D75690EC81F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAKdSQZ=LeGPTAhHLRNLyxvVCgn4FhQsC60XeS=yO-SQo+a4tLQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F0C78FD.8050104@redhat.com> <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756910D3FD@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756910D3FD@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00979.txt.bz2

On 01/18/2012 02:30 PM, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
> Yes, we use Atom for EEMBC measurements.
>
> We'll be glad to help you with your findings.
>
>
Thanks.

Unfortunately I tried several alternative patches but I did not find a 
better solution (it is mostly code size degradation on CoreI7).  Now I 
am even thinking that the best action would have been ignoring the 
original PR.