From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-315501-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17385 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2012 12:44:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 17369 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2012 12:44:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (HELO rcsinet15.oracle.com) (148.87.113.117)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:43:24 +0000
Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237])	by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q2NChD1x021490	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:43:14 GMT
Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158])	by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2NChC6U023126	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:43:12 GMT
Received: from abhmt110.oracle.com (abhmt110.oracle.com [141.146.116.62])	by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q2NChBhe025493;	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:43:11 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.52.193.33)	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)	with ESMTP ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 05:43:10 -0700
Message-ID: <4F6C6F26.9010905@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:44:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120215 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
CC: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,        ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, mikestump@comcast.net,        Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>, bonzini@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator
References: <000001ccfc22$59706ed0$0c514c70$@guo@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <000001ccfc22$59706ed0$0c514c70$@guo@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01560.txt.bz2

Hi,

On 03/07/2012 06:22 AM, Terry Guo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anybody please review and approve the following simple patch? Thanks
> very much.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-08/msg00063.html
apparently somebody, somewhere, approved this patch, because I see:

2012-03-13  Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>

     * testsuite/Makefile.in (TEST_GCC_EXEC_PREFIX): New.

but frankly the commit as-is didn't make much sense, because the *.in 
files are generated: a sensible patch should have touched the *.am file 
and then, upon approval, committed also the files change by 'autoreconf'.

Anyway, the change doesn't exist anymore, because the next 'autoreconf' 
(of mine, as it happens) of course wiped it out.

Please clarify.

Thanks,
Paolo.