From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13221 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 15:31:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 13186 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2012 15:31:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:31:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2QFVMpR013470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:31:22 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-142.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.142]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2QFVMwt005454; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:31:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4F708BC9.7010706@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:31:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ajinkya Dhobale CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "Jayant R. Sonar" Subject: Re: [PATCH H8300] Add function_vector attribute References: <157AA791EDB3C743B0B0D29B559D6A0D33B63CDA@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> In-Reply-To: <157AA791EDB3C743B0B0D29B559D6A0D33B63CDA@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01660.txt.bz2 On 03/26/2012 08:18 AM, Ajinkya Dhobale wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the attached "h8300-func-vect.patch" that adds > 'function_vector' attribute for H8300 target. > > I have taken the reference from previously posted patch for GCC-3.4.2: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02529.html > > I have updated functionality of the attribute to GCC-4.7.0 source. > Can someone please review the patch and let me know if there should be > any modifications in it? > > I will briefly mention about 'function_vector' attribute. > For test code: [ ... ] How is this different than the function vector support that is already in GCC for the H8/300 series processors? Jeff