From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp001-out.apm-internet.net (smtp001-out.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.222]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E786E3858D39 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:14:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E786E3858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sandoe.co.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sandoe.co.uk Received: (qmail 513 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2022 16:14:40 -0000 X-APM-Out-ID: 16644680800050 X-APM-Authkey: 257869/1(257869/1) 12 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.95?) (81.138.1.83) by smtp001.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 29 Sep 2022 16:14:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc64 handling [PR106680] From: Iain Sandoe In-Reply-To: <826f30b1-a3fe-4227-1874-5e4f5a1f6d56@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:14:40 +0100 Cc: GCC Patches , Segher Boessenkool Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4F795875-4D05-4FFE-8DF2-50AF20E19139@sandoe.co.uk> References: <9d9f1f43-b528-387d-45a7-1d89400de0fc@linux.ibm.com> <5B4DCBBB-3237-4A9F-ACCA-6669DE6905B8@sandoe.co.uk> <92415AC8-4A5A-4119-BFCC-D7C66472F961@sandoe.co.uk> <5e64fed0-7e79-3d60-da62-5c2bf3e2c707@linux.ibm.com> <75315B0E-9812-4726-A7FA-57762A2E47B7@sandoe.co.uk> <826f30b1-a3fe-4227-1874-5e4f5a1f6d56@linux.ibm.com> To: "Kewen.Lin" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_COUK,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Kewen, > On 29 Sep 2022, at 10:12, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches = wrote: > on 2022/9/29 16:16, Iain Sandoe wrote: >>>=20 >>> I'm testing the attached diff which can be applied on top of the = previous proposed patch >>> on ppc64 and ppc64le, could you help to test it can fix the issue? >>=20 >> It does work on a cross from x86_64-darwin =3D> powerpc-darwin, I can = also do compile-only >> tests there with a dummy board and the new tests pass with one minor = tweak as described >> below. >> full regstrap on the G5 will take a day or so .. but I=E2=80=99ll do = the C target tests first to get a heads up >=20 > Thanks! I think the C target tests is enough for now.=20 Bootstrap (powerpc-darwin9 on G5) succeeded and the C tests look = nominal. Cheers Iain