From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26047 invoked by alias); 16 May 2017 12:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25986 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2017 12:13:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=1.5.0, H*f:sk:tPQ@mai, H*i:sk:tPQ@mai, H*f:sk:BvKk2hj X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wm0-f65.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f65.google.com) (74.125.82.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 12:13:31 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id y10so37818864wmh.0; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:13:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; bh=XksTVLMhLj8nKkmTycj7gDBp1mHQ1FV2bln66u7H0O0=; b=onnOMVRu6CRan2r0v0j/6vpi6gNSwDXYPMUKCRckNVeZA5IgL+DZmn3G7hgHfvHr5X pHq97NbZvjCHPMbjYGw5HAKUYZJfHoB/4Tu+u7xcvKaK2bD3411dW/Yktx4ay4+2CAM2 n0nWP/d8lFZ6lDQWPwEiwc1Kd8kzmPQmhmAUsZRZ3/TS2m3Lzk0ohMcYQATBOfPsML3Y MDFem2S+CHUSEackeElyD+iXD1GQPBVj3nLjTTf7IICsANbpGW7XhcqNWH0ge5tUISMr yG2HQ9i7b89tHITavgJBV0PDann3ILFfTa7wRMkrrm412Aw//YjkZoI7WykBnoZJf0uT Hc5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB58mhw8bT2JeHNjHnhfJJmA+Voz3SckyrVAbG6NagUqvjn82OP OnE3Qjw6tFAceA== X-Received: by 10.28.98.9 with SMTP id w9mr6736186wmb.16.1494936812487; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [100.106.144.231] (213-225-9-98.nat.highway.a1.net. [213.225.9.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g21sm2216743wrg.22.2017.05.16.05.13.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 May 2017 05:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 12:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1441916913-11547-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1441916913-11547-3-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <55F720E6.7020709@redhat.com> <4CB1399A-23A6-44F7-A25F-ECBD953E03A0@gmail.com> <55F74C3D.50504@redhat.com> <1442344899.32352.101.camel@surprise> <55F87A07.6010809@redhat.com> <5B7C7A4F-122E-4485-B3F7-15309B91B21E@gmail.com> <20170513102412.fgwlr6m7bdrrgt5n@nbbrfq.cc.univie.ac.at> <20170513103834.GQ1809@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: dejagnu version update? To: Jonathan Wakely ,Jakub Jelinek CC: Jeff Law ,David Malcolm ,Mike Stump ,gcc-patches List ,GCC Development From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Message-ID: <4FE7E284-0A0B-469E-AFF6-3BD1F2E1B431@gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg01267.txt.bz2 On 16 May 2017 11:54:18 CEST, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >On 13 May 2017 at 11:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >wrote: >>> I guess neither redhat >>> (https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/dejagnu/ redirects to a >>> login page but there seem to be 1.5.1 packages) nor SuSE did update >dejagnu in the meantime. >> >> Fedora has dejagnu-1.6 in Fedora 25 and later, dejagnu-1.5.3 in >Fedora 24, older >> Fedora versions are EOL. RHEL 7 has dejagnu-1.5.1, RHEL 6 as well as >RHEL 5 has >> dejagnu-1.4.4, older RHEL versions are EOL. > >FWIW 1.5.3 has a fix which I rely on for libstdc++ testing, but since >newer versions are trivial to install by hand I'll be OK if we only >bump the minimum to 1.5.0 1.5.0 wouldn't buy us anything as the "libdirs" handling is only in 1.5.2 a= nd later. thanks