From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B62385EC4E for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:30:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F2B62385EC4E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mliska@suse.cz X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17954B048; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [patch] multi-range implementation for value_range (irange) To: Gerald Pfeifer , Aldy Hernandez Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <83e8e27a-b49d-64e4-8a98-ee438512c3a5@suse.cz> <9f5d93cf-5592-c710-a262-ab5a1e7ef3b5@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= Message-ID: <4c45c51a-029f-6abb-8962-0d7c132f31e6@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:30:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:30:29 -0000 On 8/10/20 12:22 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > If your test bootstraping with GCC passes, I think (especially as > the original author of this code) you can invoke the obvious rule > and go ahead. Yes, I would also consider it an obvious change. Martin