* [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg
@ 2021-06-23 11:33 Robin Dapp
2021-07-05 10:28 ` Robin Dapp
2021-10-14 8:49 ` Richard Sandiford
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robin Dapp @ 2021-06-23 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 838 bytes --]
Hi,
while evaluating another patch that introduces more lvalue paradoxical
subregs I ran into an ICE in combine at
wide_int o = wi::insert (rtx_mode_t (outer, temp_mode),
rtx_mode_t (inner, dest_mode),
offset, width);
because width (=GET_MODE_PRECISION (dest_mode)) > GET_MODE_PRECISION
(temp_mode).
From the comments and the code it looks like we do not want to handle a
paradoxical subreg here so I quickly added a check for it which prevents
the ICE. The check could also be added to reg_subword_p () I guess.
Is this the right thing to do or am I missing something, i.e. my other
patch might be doing something it should not?
Bootstrap on s390x was successful and testsuite is looking good so far.
Regards
Robin
--
gcc/ChangeLog:
* combine.c (try_combine): Check for paradoxical subreg.
[-- Attachment #2: 0011-combine-paradoxical-subreg-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 949 bytes --]
From 2b74c66f8d97c30c45e99336c9871cccd8cf94e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:35:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] combine paradoxical subreg fix.
---
gcc/combine.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 6476812a212..de04560db21 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -2782,7 +2782,8 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2, rtx_insn *i1, rtx_insn *i0,
&& CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (SET_SRC (temp_expr))
&& GET_CODE (PATTERN (i3)) == SET
&& CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (SET_SRC (PATTERN (i3)))
- && reg_subword_p (SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3)), SET_DEST (temp_expr)))
+ && reg_subword_p (SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3)), SET_DEST (temp_expr))
+ && !paradoxical_subreg_p (SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3))))
{
rtx dest = SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3));
rtx temp_dest = SET_DEST (temp_expr);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg
2021-06-23 11:33 [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg Robin Dapp
@ 2021-07-05 10:28 ` Robin Dapp
2021-09-24 10:17 ` Robin Dapp
2021-10-14 8:49 ` Richard Sandiford
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robin Dapp @ 2021-07-05 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * combine.c (try_combine): Check for paradoxical subreg.
ping.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg
2021-07-05 10:28 ` Robin Dapp
@ 2021-09-24 10:17 ` Robin Dapp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robin Dapp @ 2021-09-24 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches
Hi,
pinging this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573509.html
It introduces a check for a paradoxical subreg in combine that would ICE
otherwise.
Regards
Robin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg
2021-06-23 11:33 [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg Robin Dapp
2021-07-05 10:28 ` Robin Dapp
@ 2021-10-14 8:49 ` Richard Sandiford
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Sandiford @ 2021-10-14 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches
Sorry for the slow review.
Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> while evaluating another patch that introduces more lvalue paradoxical
> subregs I ran into an ICE in combine at
>
> wide_int o = wi::insert (rtx_mode_t (outer, temp_mode),
> rtx_mode_t (inner, dest_mode),
> offset, width);
>
> because width (=GET_MODE_PRECISION (dest_mode)) > GET_MODE_PRECISION
> (temp_mode).
>
> From the comments and the code it looks like we do not want to handle a
> paradoxical subreg here so I quickly added a check for it which prevents
> the ICE. The check could also be added to reg_subword_p () I guess.
Yeah, I think adding it to reg_subword_p would be better, immediately
after the GET_CODE (x) == SUBREG test.
OK with that change, thanks.
Richard
>
> Is this the right thing to do or am I missing something, i.e. my other
> patch might be doing something it should not?
>
> Bootstrap on s390x was successful and testsuite is looking good so far.
>
> Regards
> Robin
>
> --
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * combine.c (try_combine): Check for paradoxical subreg.
>
> From 2b74c66f8d97c30c45e99336c9871cccd8cf94e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:35:37 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 11/11] combine paradoxical subreg fix.
>
> ---
> gcc/combine.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
> index 6476812a212..de04560db21 100644
> --- a/gcc/combine.c
> +++ b/gcc/combine.c
> @@ -2782,7 +2782,8 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2, rtx_insn *i1, rtx_insn *i0,
> && CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (SET_SRC (temp_expr))
> && GET_CODE (PATTERN (i3)) == SET
> && CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (SET_SRC (PATTERN (i3)))
> - && reg_subword_p (SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3)), SET_DEST (temp_expr)))
> + && reg_subword_p (SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3)), SET_DEST (temp_expr))
> + && !paradoxical_subreg_p (SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3))))
> {
> rtx dest = SET_DEST (PATTERN (i3));
> rtx temp_dest = SET_DEST (temp_expr);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-14 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-23 11:33 [PATCH] combine: Check for paradoxical subreg Robin Dapp
2021-07-05 10:28 ` Robin Dapp
2021-09-24 10:17 ` Robin Dapp
2021-10-14 8:49 ` Richard Sandiford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).