From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413B3382CDC9 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:45:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 413B3382CDC9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D292933E65; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 01:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from naga.localdomain (193-83-131-169.adsl.highway.telekom.at [193.83.131.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DEBF33E6C; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 01:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 07:45:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOCS] Mention removed ports in GCC 13. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4e6c92ba-f510-1b26-4e76-2d7dd2421141@pfeifer.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1155144052-1661579153=:10886" X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1155144052-1661579153=:10886 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Liška wrote: > Ready for master? Looks fine. Tthank you, Martin! Gerald --8323328-1155144052-1661579153=:10886-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413B3382CDC9 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:45:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 413B3382CDC9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D292933E65; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 01:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from naga.localdomain (193-83-131-169.adsl.highway.telekom.at [193.83.131.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DEBF33E6C; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 01:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 07:45:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOCS] Mention removed ports in GCC 13. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4e6c92ba-f510-1b26-4e76-2d7dd2421141@pfeifer.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:45:55 -0000 Message-ID: <20220827054551.hJXO22A3IqrkwcHDeAoNq_ZoWT0bIxnxrlCy1doQ8DY@z> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Liška wrote: > Ready for master? Looks fine. Tthank you, Martin! Gerald