public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>,Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Bernd Edlinger
	<bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"
	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change default for --param allow-...-data-races to off
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f368295-ca87-454f-8300-212ec86de48d@email.android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140625220321.GA18164@virgil.suse>

On June 26, 2014 12:03:21 AM CEST, Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:14:31PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 06/24/14 14:19, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> >>Hi Martin,
>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Well actually, I am not sure if we ever wanted to have a race
>condition here.
>> >>>>Have you seen any impact of --param allow-store-data-races on any
>benchmark?
>> >>>
>> >>>It's trivially to write one. The only pass that checks the param
>is
>> >>>tree loop invariant motion and it does that when it applies
>store-motion.
>> >>>Register pressure increase is increased by a factor of two.
>> >>>
>> >>>So I'd agree that we might want to disable this again for -Ofast.
>> >>>
>> >>>As nothing tests for the PACKED variants nor for the LOAD variant
>> >>>I'd rather remove those. Claiming we don't create races for those
>> >>>when you disable it via the param is simply not true.
>> >>>
>> >>>Thanks,
>> >>>Richard.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>OK, please go ahead with your patch.
>> >
>> >Perhaps not unsurprisingly, the patch is very similar.  Bootstrapped
>> >and tested on x86_64-linux.  OK for trunk?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Martin
>> >
>> >
>> >2014-06-24  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>
>> >
>> >	* params.def (PARAM_ALLOW_LOAD_DATA_RACES)
>> >	(PARAM_ALLOW_PACKED_LOAD_DATA_RACES)
>> >	(PARAM_ALLOW_PACKED_STORE_DATA_RACES): Removed.
>> >	(PARAM_ALLOW_STORE_DATA_RACES): Set default to zero.
>> >	* opts.c (default_options_optimization): Set
>> >	PARAM_ALLOW_STORE_DATA_RACES to one at -Ofast.
>> >	* doc/invoke.texi (allow-load-data-races)
>> >	(allow-packed-load-data-races, allow-packed-store-data-races):
>> >	Removed.
>> >	(allow-store-data-races): Document the new default.
>> >
>> >testsuite/
>> >	* g++.dg/simulate-thread/bitfields-2.C: Remove
>allow-load-data-races
>> >	parameter.
>> >	* g++.dg/simulate-thread/bitfields.C: Likewise.
>> >	* gcc.dg/simulate-thread/strict-align-global.c: Remove
>> >	allow-packed-store-data-races parameter.
>> >	* gcc.dg/simulate-thread/subfields.c: Likewise.
>> >	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20050314-1.c: Set parameter
>allow-store-data-races
>> >	to one.
>> Don't we want to deprecate, not remove the dead options?
>> 
>
>Is there a mechanism for deprecating parameters (I could not quickly
>find any) or do you mean to leave them there and only document them as
>deprecated?
>
>I am not really concerned how we deal with the unused parameters,
>removing or any form of deprecating is fine with me.

--params are not a stable interface, so we can just remove those.  Of course this would be the opportunity to introduce a real option for this task and leave the param as an implementation detail.

Richard.

>Thanks,
>
>Martin


  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-26  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-19 16:18 Bernd Edlinger
2014-06-20 11:44 ` Martin Jambor
2014-06-23  8:03   ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-06-23  8:50     ` Richard Biener
2014-06-23 13:35       ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-06-24 20:19         ` Martin Jambor
2014-06-25  8:14           ` Richard Biener
2014-06-25  8:54             ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-06-25  8:56               ` Richard Biener
2014-06-25  9:48                 ` Marc Glisse
2014-06-25 21:14           ` Jeff Law
2014-06-25 22:03             ` Martin Jambor
2014-06-26  6:43               ` Richard Biener [this message]
2014-06-26  7:53                 ` Bernd Edlinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f368295-ca87-454f-8300-212ec86de48d@email.android.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjambor@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).