From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E203858D37 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 03:54:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C2E203858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn Received: from [10.20.4.52] (unknown [10.20.4.52]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8DxReLdczJjUpUiAA--.64194S2; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:54:05 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Pass cache information to optimizer To: Xi Ruoyao , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Wang Xuerui , Chenghua Xu References: <20220926065805.15717-1-xry111@xry111.site> <79a5f56c-e526-0b71-daa9-5b0867a22f9b@loongson.cn> <512fd41401b76f221a6f074ff13ca17d02187c7c.camel@xry111.site> From: Lulu Cheng Message-ID: <4f9e575e-5af1-0ada-570e-2b545699ff5d@loongson.cn> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:54:05 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <512fd41401b76f221a6f074ff13ca17d02187c7c.camel@xry111.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf8DxReLdczJjUpUiAA--.64194S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7XF1furWkZrWfWF43JFyUGFg_yoW3Zwb_Wr 1jkF9rCr1UAr4IgFsxtrn8A340k3y5ur13GrWqgrnIvas5ZrZ7Crs7W34xZan3t34SgF15 Ja4fC3yxK390qjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbIkFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_ Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwCYjI0SjxkI62AI1cAE67vI Y487MxkIecxEwVCm-wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s 026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_ JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20x vEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE 14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf 9x0JUdEfOUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: xfkh0wpoxo3qxorr0wxvrqhubq/ X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: 在 2022/9/27 上午11:16, Xi Ruoyao 写道: > On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 15:04 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote: >> This change may have to wait for the test results to determine whether >> to merge. > With this patch and my other pending patches > > - https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602172.html > - https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602163.html > > No regression from trunk: > > $ diff -u ~/gcc-result-{unpatched,patched} | grep '[+-]FAIL' > -FAIL: gcc.dg/pr105414.c execution test > -FAIL: gcc.dg/pr106397.c (test for excess errors) > > But if you mean "benchmark", yes I've not run any because I don't have > access to one :(. Yes, my colleague is testing the spec to see if this modification will cause some of the spec's test case scores to drop.