From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <aldot@gcc.gnu.org>,
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] c++: Set the locus of the function result decl
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:53:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fcd1dd6-1691-6974-f181-3c57a4c305c9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117095647.42fefe06@nbbrfq>
On 11/17/22 03:56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:52:41 -0500
> Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/22 13:45, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> * decl.cc (start_function): Set the result decl source location to
>>> the location of the typespec.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_86-unknown-linux with no regressions.
>>> Ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
>>> Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> gcc/cp/decl.cc | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>>> index 6e98ea35a39..ed40815e645 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>>> @@ -17449,6 +17449,8 @@ start_function (cp_decl_specifier_seq *declspecs,
>>> tree attrs)
>>> {
>>> tree decl1;
>>> + tree result;
>>> + bool ret;
>>
>> We now prefer to declare new variables as late as possible, usually when
>> they are initialized.
>
> Moved. Ok like attached? Bootstrapped and regtested fine.
>
>>> decl1 = grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, FUNCDEF, 1, &attrs);
>>> invoke_plugin_callbacks (PLUGIN_START_PARSE_FUNCTION, decl1);
>>> @@ -17461,7 +17463,18 @@ start_function (cp_decl_specifier_seq *declspecs,
>>> gcc_assert (same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (decl1)),
>>> integer_type_node));
>>>
>>> - return start_preparsed_function (decl1, attrs, /*flags=*/SF_DEFAULT);
>>> + ret = start_preparsed_function (decl1, attrs, /*flags=*/SF_DEFAULT);
>>> +
>>> + /* decl1 might be ggc_freed here. */
>>> + decl1 = current_function_decl;
>>> +
>>> + /* Set the result decl source location to the location of the typespec. */
>>> + if (TREE_CODE (decl1) == FUNCTION_DECL
>>> + && declspecs->locations[ds_type_spec] != UNKNOWN_LOCATION
>>> + && (result = DECL_RESULT (decl1)) != NULL_TREE
>>> + && DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (result) == input_location)
>>> + DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (result) = declspecs->locations[ds_type_spec];
>>
>> One way to handle the template case would be for the code in
>> start_preparsed_function that sets DECL_RESULT to check whether decl1 is
>> a template instantiation, and in that case copy the location from the
>> template's DECL_RESULT, i.e.
>>
>> DECL_RESULT (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl1)))
>
> Well, that would probably work if something would set the location of
> that template result decl properly, which nothing does out of the box.
Hmm, it should get set by your patch, since templates go through
start_function like normal functions.
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> index ed7226b82f0..65d78c82a2d 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> @@ -17230,6 +17231,17 @@ start_preparsed_function (tree decl1, tree attrs, int flags)
> cp_apply_type_quals_to_decl (cp_type_quals (restype), resdecl);
> }
>
> + /* Set the result decl source location to the location of the typespec. */
> + if (DECL_RESULT (decl1)
> + && !DECL_USE_TEMPLATE (decl1)
> + && DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (decl1)
> + && DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl1)
> + && DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl1))
> + && DECL_RESULT (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl1))))
This condition is true only for the template definition, for which you
haven't gotten to your start_function change yet.
Instead, you want to copy the location for instantiations, i.e. check
DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION instead of !DECL_USE_TEMPLATE.
> + DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (DECL_RESULT (decl1))
> + = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (
Open paren goes on the new line.
> + DECL_RESULT (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl1)))); > /* Record the decl so that the function name is defined.
> If we already have a decl for this name, and it is a FUNCTION_DECL,
> use the old decl. */
>
> (gdb) call inform(DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (DECL_RESULT (decl1)), "decl1 result locus before")
> ../tmp4/return-narrow-2.cc:7:3: note: decl1 result locus before
> 7 | { return _M_finish != 0; }
> | ^
> (gdb) n
> (gdb) call inform(DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (DECL_RESULT (decl1)), "decl1 result locus from TI")
> ../tmp4/return-narrow-2.cc:7:3: note: decl1 result locus from TI
> (gdb) p DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (DECL_RESULT (decl1))
> $1 = 267168
>
> I'm leaving the template case alone for now, maybe i'm motivated later
> on to again look at grokfndecl and/or grokmethod to fill in the proper
> location. For starters i only need normal functions.
> But many thanks for the hint on where the template stuff is, i thought
> i would not need it at all but had hoped that there is a spot where
> both declspec are at hand and something is "derived" from the templates.
>
>>
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> \f
>>> /* Returns true iff an EH_SPEC_BLOCK should be created in the body of
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-12 23:45 [PATCH 0/5] function result decl location; type demotion Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-12 23:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] c: Set the locus of the function result decl Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-14 21:25 ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-12 23:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] c++: " Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-15 23:52 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-17 8:56 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-17 14:53 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2022-11-17 19:02 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-17 23:52 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-18 10:49 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-18 16:06 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-18 18:26 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-19 9:56 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-20 17:06 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-22 20:25 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-23 15:28 ` Jason Merrill
2022-12-02 19:30 ` Jason Merrill
2022-12-02 19:55 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-12 23:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] Fortran: Narrow return types [PR78798] Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-13 10:13 ` Janne Blomqvist
2022-11-13 10:39 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-13 20:29 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-11-13 20:29 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-11-13 21:50 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-14 12:27 ` Mikael Morin
2023-05-14 13:04 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-05-14 15:24 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-14 18:06 ` Mikael Morin
2023-05-18 19:52 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-12 23:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] value-range: Add as_string diagnostics helper Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-11-12 23:55 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-11-17 3:30 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-12 23:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] gimple: Add pass to note possible type demotions; IPA pro/demotion; DO NOT MERGE Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4fcd1dd6-1691-6974-f181-3c57a4c305c9@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=aldot@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nathan@acm.org \
--cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).