From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27974 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2012 18:08:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 27961 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2012 18:08:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (HELO rcsinet15.oracle.com) (148.87.113.117) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:08:29 +0000 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q6TI8RSJ025352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:08:28 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6TI8RbO008470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:08:27 GMT Received: from abhmt120.oracle.com (abhmt120.oracle.com [141.146.116.72]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q6TI8RM9007834; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:08:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.33.223.73) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:08:26 -0700 Message-ID: <50157C18.3050104@oracle.com> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:51:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Wakely CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Dumont?= , "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: PR 54075 Restore 4.6 growth factor References: <50145054.2060102@gmail.com> <50156F9D.4050701@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg01453.txt.bz2 On 07/29/2012 07:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Yes please. The point is to allow people to review and comment before > the patch is applied, and some people only subscribe to gcc-patches > not libstdc++. I don't have a strong opinion, but I must say that I don't understand why those people don't subscribe to libstdc++: since we *do* have a separate mailing list, IMO if they are interested they should. On the other hand, if they *really* don't care (eg, some people don't even like C++ in general ;) sending all the traffic to gcc-patches too may seem a mild form of spamming. But, as I said, I don't have a strong opinion, and personally I'm not terribly consistent ;) Paolo.