From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-324223-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1862 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2012 20:41:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 1852 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2012 20:41:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:41:24 +0000
Received: by vcbfy27 with SMTP id fy27so2081045vcb.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type         :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;        bh=a30HLU0uElVXNdippkQyI35rLLwA7r7mXql1apWSCx8=;        b=oAvMVQzTvkBn09VvasJOJ4F2ESIw2ABf5zUlclE8Zn2GvCwInLzkOPp6YGUg7qr3sF         jsPel2/Yqw1YxqtBxaUGHBCiH8lxqPdYOjc5pHTXnMZ9LgmEgHV+gbWzXmdSSSSYRBYA         BhLWrmpuWDWnraFiR2elCAC11iixZVfmlq2ZkjXksfmhBGohUaabapmYAzZFi04RSfxz         40jkCPg1kVrWKAyqLgsEMzl6JASldNtaLvXzSk9HmjbdI1/enI2WyoS6g5wOhVKlS7gm         WaYI650xrqtH+Gmp1H7NNT1mjHWrJqneP/VrhV798NfjnprhvtW8rSmCUFhVY4BDR+nr         cXgg==
Received: by 10.52.178.170 with SMTP id cz10mr3178233vdc.44.1344631283968;        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.178.170 with SMTP id cz10mr3178224vdc.44.1344631283848;        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dnovillo-macbookpro.local ([172.26.45.69])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cr4sm4151633vdb.7.2012.08.10.13.41.22        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <502571F1.20205@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:41:00 -0000
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
CC: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,  Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, laurynas.biveinis@gmail.com,  Lawrence Crowl <crowl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [cxx-conversion] Support garbage-collected C++ templates
References: <20120808195258.GA30576@google.com> <CAAiZkiDiONKGbicEr6mKLRoGiD9vTwhcU0udTSpEV+Ro-zi23g@mail.gmail.com> <5022CDF8.9000300@google.com> <CAAiZkiDh+h0fh25tbWU34=vh0LZF9mpD2-a8aT+0ySJDL8KBJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD_=9DST5GHT2cKOUziz4pNyX7DjRCtpZY=oNAqBGm_iUPQxog@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiZkiBoTtZgrJ5KYaeTc508BtY+19-vHPke5qV8S4qe7_j=Tg@mail.gmail.com> <5022D9BD.4060708@google.com> <CAFiYyc0sMgAaWoh+Sg7BVyATFDh2sVb7Ac0_Ne9dP+ubMnY5SQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD_=9DS5Ur4yTVcRLNPvkdS6_6JOLt8rX=fxahzxFb-wMWpY7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2AGosq5BbwbztY970+_1F8sKmkoxoBrrYxH7d0KsR9JA@mail.gmail.com> <50252386.8000505@google.com> <50256B94.4070201@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <50256B94.4070201@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm61AR8JJAOYqb5yWsRXBKWbzKt4m+ddv1Eicmxtb6bdTiVsFiq0DlLjXLHtkkt846xzFEPaB0ikCvmmry5uOWgrI/krLYFtgJ7ydTNQuqdyjK350TZrx+y7xvrTPgnJjAFeM6C3gHscxxaWD4LdV0eJbFzrYj5WCocJucoMsbgri4LUqp8PZ3CDRKGnmMDdKkwZY8M
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00659.txt.bz2

On 12-08-10 16:14 , Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-08-10 08:06, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> The end point should be that the only thing we really need to tell
>> gengtype about are the variable roots.  Everything else would rely on
>> user-provided markings.  I suppose we could still keep the automatic
>> option for really simple stuff, though.
>
> Yes please.  Markup may be awkward, but I think can be less awkward
> than generating those three cookie-cutter functions.

Yeah. Another thing I suppose we want to keep is the whole 'prev' and 
'next' markings. These generate harness that would be cumbersome to 
implement from user code.


Diego.