From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17430 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2012 07:28:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17422 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2012 07:28:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:28:20 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TAyPr-0006sP-Iu from Nathan_Sidwell@mentor.com ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:28:19 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:28:19 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:28:17 +0100 Message-ID: <504D968D.1040500@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:28:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Edelsohn CC: James Lemke , GCC Patches , Catherine Moore , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Nathan SIdwell , Nathan Froyd Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC VLE port References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00565.txt.bz2 On 09/08/12 00:52, David Edelsohn wrote: > This patch contains a lot of unnecessary, gratuitous changes in > addition to being very invasive. It was not edited and cleaned > sufficiently before posting. It has too much of a negative impact on > the current PowerPC port. The patch is not going to be accepted in > its current form. could you explain in more detail what you find unsatisfactory. Thanks. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell