public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>,
	Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,
	       gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	       Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	       Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [path] PR 54900: store data race in if-conversion pass
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507E2424.7070707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507E0F25.8010605@redhat.com>

On 10/16/2012 07:51 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-10-17 09:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> +/* Like memory_modified_in_insn_p, but return TRUE if INSN will
>> +   *SURELY* modify the memory contents of MEM.  */
>> +bool
>> +memory_surely_modified_in_insn_p (const_rtx mem, const_rtx insn)
>
> I don't like the word "surely".  Are we certain or not?
>
> It's longer, but perhaps "definitely" or "must_be"?
I'd go with "must_be" or something similar.  "must" is pretty common 
terminology when talking about aliasing properties.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-17  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-15 12:53 Aldy Hernandez
2012-10-15 14:25 ` Andrew MacLeod
2012-10-16 17:32 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-10-16 17:33   ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-10-17  0:33     ` Aldy Hernandez
2012-10-17  0:54       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-10-19  1:41         ` Aldy Hernandez
2012-10-17  0:26   ` Aldy Hernandez
2012-10-17  0:54     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-10-17  4:54     ` Richard Henderson
2012-10-17  5:18       ` Jeff Law [this message]
2012-10-17 21:48         ` Aldy Hernandez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507E2424.7070707@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ian@airs.com \
    --cc=iant@google.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).