From: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
To: Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew.gretton-dann@linaro.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, patches@linaro.org, rguenther@suse.de,
rearnsha@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AC1AB4.6060402@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2043702.301rbd19p6@e103209-lin>
Am 20.11.2012 21:34, schrieb Matthew Gretton-Dann:
> All,
>
> This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet
> support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7.
>
> The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-*
> triplets which are valid in 4.7.
>
> I have tested this cross with arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and
> arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
>
> One question I do have having done this work - is there a canonical way to
> test for the arm*-*-linux-gnueabi triplet (or variants)? Various configure
> and testsuite files test for this, but there doesn't seem to be a consistent
> method.
>
> OK for 4.7?
looks fine, except one missing chunk from my original patch. maybe left out
intentionally.
Matthias
Index: b/src/gcc/config.gcc
===================================================================
--- a/src/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/src/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@
tm_file="dbxelf.h elfos.h arm/unknown-elf.h arm/elf.h arm/linux-gas.h
arm/uclinux-elf.h glibc-stdint.h"
tmake_file="arm/t-arm arm/t-arm-elf"
case ${target} in
- arm*-*-uclinux*eabi)
+ arm*-*-uclinux*eabi*)
tm_file="$tm_file arm/bpabi.h arm/uclinux-eabi.h"
tmake_file="$tmake_file arm/t-bpabi"
# The BPABI long long divmod functions return a 128-bit value in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-21 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-20 20:35 Matthew Gretton-Dann
2012-11-21 0:05 ` Matthias Klose [this message]
2012-11-21 11:49 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2012-12-17 14:35 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-12-21 10:02 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2012-11-26 12:13 ` Richard Biener
2012-11-29 14:45 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2012-12-07 13:52 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2012-12-17 14:28 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AC1AB4.6060402@ubuntu.com \
--to=doko@ubuntu.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=matthew.gretton-dann@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).