From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335250-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23918 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2013 16:22:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 23899 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2013 16:22:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx02.qsc.de (HELO mx02.qsc.de) (213.148.130.14)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:22:35 +0000
Received: from archimedes.net-b.de (port-92-195-59-88.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.59.88])	by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E9F27626;	Wed,  9 Jan 2013 17:22:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <50ED9949.8010607@net-b.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:22:00 -0000
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>
CC: gcc patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR55758 - Non-C_Bool handling with BIND(C)
References: <50DCCC29.6010206@net-b.de> <CAO9iq9HG-VhX-_7yUpg0mPjEzvRmp=ZB6bKVPQ9qtP+Yjf==_Q@mail.gmail.com> <50E01A7C.2090106@net-b.de> <50E9ABC7.4040705@net-b.de> <CAO9iq9H_Q8vX--MuDYZbV2ym5s2ur3uh_cJfQY+N=Ax5-vgrzg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO9iq9H_Q8vX--MuDYZbV2ym5s2ur3uh_cJfQY+N=Ax5-vgrzg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00493.txt.bz2

Am 08.01.2013 21:07, schrieb Janne Blomqvist:
>> As written before, I believe that the patch avoids some pitfalls with C
>> interoperability of logical variables:  On one hand, it improves
>> cross-compiler portability by rejecting non C_BOOL ones with
>> -std=f2003/f2008/f2008ts;
> This part is certainly ok.

And has now been committed as Rev. 195055.

However, I still believe that we should do something -std=gnu. See also: 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-01/msg00077.html

Tobias