On 01/10/2013 03:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gary Funck noted that vrp06.c has two tests with the same output.  After
>> further investigation it was clear that expected output strings were too
>> lenient and were in fact masking a missed optimization.
>>
>> This patch tightens the expected output from the vrp dump which has the side
>> effect of making each test's string unique.  Obviously the masked failure is
>> xfailed.
>>
>> OK for the trunk?
>
> Hmm, but if the SSA versions are simply i_10 then i_.*0 will still match it
> the same?  I think you want the more elaborate 'i_\[0-9\]* . 0' here?
Applied using Uros's regexp.  The final patch is attached for historical 
purposes.

Jeff