From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23388 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2013 16:13:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 23312 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2013 16:13:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:13:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0EGDfBb003734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:13:41 -0500 Received: from Mair.local (vpn-54-76.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.54.76]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0EGDeLW023108; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:13:40 -0500 Message-ID: <50F42EB3.4040504@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:13:00 -0000 From: Vladimir Makarov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Bosscher CC: GCC Patches Subject: Re: [lra] resync with trunk References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00702.txt.bz2 On 13-01-11 5:39 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello Vlad, > > The attached patch back-ports to the LRA branch (or foward-ports, > depending on how you look at it :-) all the changes made on the trunk > to LRA. > > Bootstrapped&tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu[1] and > ia64-unknown-linux-gnu[2], and cross-built and tested mipsisa64-elf > [3]. > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01098.html > [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01129.html > [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg01120.html > > OK for the LRA branch? > > Yes. Thanks for this and installing automatic LRA branch testing, Steven.