On 01/14/13 00:10, Manfred Schwarb wrote:
> Am 13.01.2013 21:30, schrieb Harald Anlauf:
>> On 01/12/13 22:02, Mikael Morin wrote:
>>> Le 08/01/2013 22:32, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
>>>> On 12/28/12 21:49, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> is there a default directive that is assumed when the testsuite is
>>>>> run?
>>>>>
>>>>> Running an "fgrep -L" on the fortran testsuite, I found several files
>>>>> that are missing either dg-do compile or run.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also found a funny typo in gomp/appendix-a/a.11.2.f90
>>>>> ! { do-do compile }
>>>>
>
> There are several other oddities: d_g-final, braces have to be separated
> by spaces.

Looking at the generated dump, tt appears that the occurence of
"d_g-final" is just some left-over junk and can be removed safely,
see below.  Maybe the author (Tobias B.) knows?

> Not sure about the double braces in lto, I guess they act simply as
> single braces.
>
> class_array_10.f03:! { dg-do compile}
> coarray_lib_token_4.f90:! { d_g-final { scan-tree-dump-times "bar
> \\(&parm.\[0-9\]+, caf_token.\[0-9\]+, \\(\\(integer\\(kind=.\\)
> parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\(integer\\(kind=.\\)\\) x.\[0-9\]+\\) \\+
> caf_offset.\[0-9\]+\\);" 1 "original" } }
> continuation_9.f90:! { dg-warning "not allowed by itself in line 3" ""
> {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> continuation_9.f90:! { dg-warning "not allowed by itself in line 4" ""
> {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> continuation_9.f90:! { dg-warning "not allowed by itself in line 5" ""
> {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> extends_11.f03:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "
> +recruit\\.service\\.education\\.person\\.ss =" 8 "original"} }
> lto/20091016-1_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{-flto -g -fPIC -r -nostdlib}
> {-O -flto -g -fPIC -r -nostdlib}} }
> lto/20100110-1_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{ -O1 -flto }} }
> lto/pr41521_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{-g -flto} {-g -O -flto}} }
> lto/pr46036_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{ -O -flto -ftree-vectorize }} }
> lto/pr46629_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{ -O2 -flto -ftree-vectorize
> -march=x86-64 }} { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
> lto/pr46629_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{ -O2 -flto -ftree-vectorize }} }
> lto/pr46911_0.f:! { dg-lto-options {{ -O2 -flto -g }} }
> lto/pr47839_0.f90:! { dg-lto-options {{ -g -flto }} }
> move_alloc_13.f90:! { dg-do run}
> structure_constructor_11.f90:! { dg-do run}
> tab_continuation.f:! { dg-warning "Nonconforming tab character in column
> 1 of line 10" "Nonconforming tab" {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> tab_continuation.f:! { dg-warning "Nonconforming tab character in column
> 1 of line 11" "Nonconforming tab" {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> tab_continuation.f:! { dg-warning "Nonconforming tab character in column
> 1 of line 8" "Nonconforming tab" {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> tab_continuation.f:! { dg-warning "Nonconforming tab character in column
> 1 of line 9" "Nonconforming tab" {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
> vect/vect-2.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access
> forced using versioning." 3 "vect" {target { vect_no_align || { { !
> vector_alignment_reachable  } && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } } }
> vect/vect-3.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access
> forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align || {!
> vector_alignment_reachable}} } } }
> vect/vect-3.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access
> forced using versioning" 1 "vect" { target { {! vect_no_align} && { {!
> vector_alignment_reachable} && {! vect_hw_misalign} } } } } }
> vect/vect-3.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an
> unaligned access" 1 "vect" { xfail { { vect_no_align } || { !
> vector_alignment_reachable} } } } }
> vect/vect-3.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an
> unaligned access" 2 "vect" { target { {! vect_no_align} && { {!
> vector_alignment_reachable} && {! vect_hw_misalign} } } } } }
> vect/vect-4.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access
> forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { { vect_no_align } || {!
> vector_alignment_reachable} } } } }
> vect/vect-4.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an
> unaligned access" 1 "vect" { xfail { { vect_no_align } || {!
> vector_alignment_reachable} } } } }
> vect/vect-4.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an
> unaligned access" 2 "vect" { target { {! vector_alignment_reachable} &&
> {! vect_hw_misalign} } } } }
> vect/vect-5.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access
> forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align || {!
> vector_alignment_reachable} } } } }
> vect/vect-5.f90:! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access
> forced using versioning." 1 "vect" { target { {!
> vector_alignment_reachable} && {! vect_hw_misalign} } } } }
> warning-directive-2.F90:! { dg-message "some warnings being treated as
> errors" "" {target "*-*-*"} 0 }
>
>
> cheers,
> Manfred
>

Attached there is a partial patch for the obvious parts, plus other
missed cases (missing options).  No failures, just a few more passes
from the fixed dg-do run's.

2013-01-14  Manfred Schwarb  <manfred99@gmx.ch>
	    Harald Anlauf  <anlauf@gmx.de>

	* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_4.f90: Add dg-options "-fbounds-check".
	* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_5.f90: Likewise.
	* gfortran.dg/class_array_10.f03: Fix syntax of dg-directive.
	* gfortran.dg/continuation_9.f90: Likewise.
	* gfortran.dg/move_alloc_13.f90: Likewise.
	* gfortran.dg/structure_constructor_11.f90: Likewise.
	* gfortran.dg/tab_continuation.f: Likewise.
	* gfortran.dg/warning-directive-2.F90: Likewise.
	* gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_token_4.f90: Remove misspelled directive.

Harald