From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335611-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21522 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2013 14:35:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 21385 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2013 14:35:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx02.qsc.de (HELO mx02.qsc.de) (213.148.130.14)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:35:08 +0000
Received: from archimedes.net-b.de (port-92-195-59-88.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.59.88])	by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73544277D8;	Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:35:06 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <50F6BA99.60108@net-b.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:35:00 -0000
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change DO loop translation, avoid undefined overflow and repeated step sign tests
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1301161406340.6889@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1301161406340.6889@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00854.txt.bz2

Richard Biener wrote:
>                              if (D.1912 < 0)
>                                {
>                                  if (D.1911 > D.1910)
>                                    {
>                                      goto L.6;
>                                    }
>                                  else
>                                    {
>                                      countm1.6 = ((unsigned int) D.1910 -
> (unsigned int) D.1911) / -(unsigned int) D.1912;
>                                    }
>                                }
>                              else
>                                {
>                                  if (D.1911 < D.1910)
>                                    {
>                                      goto L.6;
>                                    }
>                                  else
>                                    {
>                                      countm1.6 = ((unsigned int) D.1911 -
> (unsigned int) D.1910) / (unsigned int) D.1912;
>                                    }
>                                }

That look better.


> Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, regtests running.
> Ok for trunk?
>
> 2013-01-16  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> 	fortran/

I assume you mean 42108. (PR42131 caused the 'regression' and is a clone 
of 42108; PRs 52865/53957 are related.)

The patch is OK. Thanks!

Tobias