From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21704 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2013 15:04:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 21693 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2013 15:04:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:03:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0HF3pTR025284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:03:51 -0500 Received: from [10.36.4.234] (vpn1-4-234.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.234]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0HF3lS2032137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:03:49 -0500 Message-ID: <50F811FA.6070508@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:04:00 -0000 From: nick clifton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: janisjo@codesourcery.com CC: Janis Johnson , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rearnshaw@cambridge.arm.com Subject: Re: PING: gcc.target/arm: skip 5 tests for flag conflicts References: <871udl5k5c.fsf@redhat.com> <50F73C8B.6040700@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <50F73C8B.6040700@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00911.txt.bz2 Hi Janis, > Now I get it. This version is more selective about which multilibs > are skipped. I tested it by using multilib test flags for all valid > values for -march, with and without -mthumb as appropriate for the > arch. The ones that are now skipped are the ones that used to fail > with complaints from the compiler. > > Is this OK? Approved - please apply - thanks for persevering with this. Cheers Nick