public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PING^2] [Patch] Ignore Invalid Memory operands in constraint 'X'
@ 2013-01-23  6:35 Hurugalawadi, Naveen
  2013-01-24 19:28 ` Georg-Johann Lay
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hurugalawadi, Naveen @ 2013-01-23  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

Hi,

Please consider this as a reminder to review the patch posted at
following link:-
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00765.html

Please review the patch and let me know if its okay?

Thanks & Regards,
Naveen.H.S

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PING^2] [Patch] Ignore Invalid Memory operands in constraint 'X'
  2013-01-23  6:35 [PING^2] [Patch] Ignore Invalid Memory operands in constraint 'X' Hurugalawadi, Naveen
@ 2013-01-24 19:28 ` Georg-Johann Lay
  2013-01-25 18:03   ` Mike Stump
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Georg-Johann Lay @ 2013-01-24 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hurugalawadi, Naveen; +Cc: gcc-patches

Hurugalawadi, Naveen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please consider this as a reminder to review the patch posted at
> following link:-
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00765.html

What is this good for?

Why are you changing the semantics of an existing, global constraint?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PING^2] [Patch] Ignore Invalid Memory operands in constraint 'X'
  2013-01-24 19:28 ` Georg-Johann Lay
@ 2013-01-25 18:03   ` Mike Stump
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2013-01-25 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Georg-Johann Lay; +Cc: Hurugalawadi, Naveen, gcc-patches

On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> Please consider this as a reminder to review the patch posted at
>> following link:-
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00765.html
> 
> What is this good for?
> 
> Why are you changing the semantics of an existing, global constraint?

Don't worry, we reject this patch; it is a bad idea.  X does in fact mean, place no constraints on it.  If a port wants something between X and r, then the port will define their own letter and use it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-25 18:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-23  6:35 [PING^2] [Patch] Ignore Invalid Memory operands in constraint 'X' Hurugalawadi, Naveen
2013-01-24 19:28 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2013-01-25 18:03   ` Mike Stump

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).