From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28507 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2013 15:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 28498 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2013 15:11:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:11:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0SFB09I014954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:11:00 -0500 Received: from [10.36.6.113] (vpn1-6-113.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.113]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0SFAuq7007280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:10:58 -0500 Message-ID: <5106941C.5020404@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:11:00 -0000 From: nick clifton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Turner CC: Xinyu Qi , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Ramana Radhakrishnan , Richard Earnshaw , Paul Brook Subject: Re: [PATCH ARM iWMMXt 0/5] Improve iWMMXt support References: <1338264799-12374-1-git-send-email-mattst88@gmail.com> <4FD840A2.2000806@redhat.com> <4FE9CDA6.7070307@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01322.txt.bz2 Hi Matt, > Could this patch, or perhaps the much smaller one I attached to bug > 35294 be committed to the 4.7 branch? Yes. Done. > Also, could you close its duplicates, bugs 36798 and 36966? Sorry no. I do not actually own these PRs, so I cannot close them. :-( Cheers Nick