From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9640 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2013 18:20:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9615 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2013 18:20:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx02.qsc.de (HELO mx02.qsc.de) (213.148.130.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:20:12 +0000 Received: from archimedes.net-b.de (port-92-195-225-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.225.65]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3732791B; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:20:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <511BD95A.6070307@net-b.de> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:20:00 -0000 From: Tobias Burnus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc patches , gfortran Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] Remove the Fortran-only flag -fno-whole-file References: <50E76646.5030300@net-b.de> In-Reply-To: <50E76646.5030300@net-b.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00633.txt.bz2 *** PING *** I think it is now a bit late for 4.8. Thus, I change my request to: OK for the 4.9 trunk? Tobias On January 5, 2013 00:31, Tobias Burnus wrote: > This patch "removes" -fno-whole-file. (Actually, it turns it into > "Ignore".) > > > Reasoning: > > * -fwhole-file/-fno-whole-file was added in 4.5 to make the transition > easier; -fwhole-file is the default since 4.6. > > * There are many wrong-code issues and probably also some ICEs with > -fno-whole file. > > * The generated code of -fwhole-file is faster as it allows for inlining. > > * -fno-whole-file has been deprecated since 4.6 and announced for > removal. > > * Code cleanup is always nice (diff -w): 17 insertions(+), 80 > deletions(-) > > > Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux. > OK for the trunk? > > > Tobias > > PS: Dominique pointed out that PR 45128 is a -fwhole-file > "regression". However, it mainly shows that gfortran needs the new > array descriptor to fix such subpointer issues (and other PRs).