From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 660 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2013 15:46:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 651 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2013 15:46:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:46:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r25Fkio9031132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:46:45 -0500 Received: from toll.usersys.redhat.com (toll.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.165]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r25FkiTh014853 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:46:44 -0500 Message-ID: <51361103.30508@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:46:00 -0000 From: Vladimir Makarov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20130305131224.GH12913@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130305131224.GH12913@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2 On 03/05/2013 08:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for all the recent reviews of memory leak plugging patches, > there are 4 still unreviewed from last week though. > > LRA leak fix: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg01239.html > This patch is ok too.