From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10421 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2013 09:04:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10413 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2013 09:04:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:04:23 +0000 Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:04:21 +0000 Received: from [10.1.72.50] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:04:20 +0000 Message-ID: <5139A993.4010906@arm.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:04:00 -0000 From: Marcus Shawcroft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Andrew Pinski , Paolo Bonzini , Alexandre Oliva , Matthias Klose , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix -print-multi-os-directory for aarch64 References: <20130307111536.GA12913@tucnak.redhat.com> <20130307164501.GI12913@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130307164501.GI12913@tucnak.redhat.com> X-MC-Unique: 113030809042100801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 On 07/03/13 16:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> AFAIK aarch64 libraries are supposed to go into /usr/lib64 etc. >>> directories similarly to x86-64 etc., but as aarch64 isn't a true >>> multilib target (having two different backends for 32-bit vs. 64-bit co= de), >>> currently gcc -print-multi-os-directory prints . instead of ../lib64. >> >> I think glibc is broken also. So after this change, the build using >> the released 2.17 and this new gcc breaks. > > Then glibc will need patching too. Distros using multiarch aren't affect= ed > by this, others IMHO will want it in */lib64 and for aarch64 IMHO it isn't > still too late for that change. > > Jakub > Hi, Moving from /lib to /lib64 will affect binutils 2.23 (ld) and glibc=20 2.17. This seems to me to be a rather disruptive change this late in=20 the day. Cheers /Marcus