public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/56567 (ICE with lambda returning init-list)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <513E0444.4040506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513A09D3.5020900@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]

On 03/08/2013 10:54 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> My initial proposal for allowing general return type deduction allowed
> deduction of std::initializer_list, which is not permitted by C++11. But
> this doesn't make sense, because the underlying array will immediately
> leak, so we should just give an error even in C++1y.

As pointed out in the PR, this approach was wrong because it's possible 
to have an expression with std::initializer_list type; the thing 
returned might not have itself been a brace-enclosed init list.  So 
let's catch that earlier.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.



[-- Attachment #2: 56567-2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1706 bytes --]

commit 3d3cc430920cbb17be4e85742c34d51b94537a37
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 11 12:03:31 2013 -0400

    	PR c++/56567
    	* typeck.c (check_return_expr): Disallow returning init list here.
    	* semantics.c (apply_deduced_return_type): Not here.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 233765a..e909b98 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -9061,12 +9061,6 @@ apply_deduced_return_type (tree fco, tree return_type)
   if (return_type == error_mark_node)
     return;
 
-  if (is_std_init_list (return_type))
-    {
-      error ("returning %qT", return_type);
-      return_type = void_type_node;
-    }
-
   if (LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P (fco))
     {
       tree lambda = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (current_class_type);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index 58295d7..58ebcc0 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -8136,6 +8136,11 @@ check_return_expr (tree retval, bool *no_warning)
 		  "deduced to %<void%>");
 	  type = error_mark_node;
 	}
+      else if (retval && BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (retval))
+	{
+	  error ("returning initializer list");
+	  type = error_mark_node;
+	}
       else
 	{
 	  if (!retval)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-initlist3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-initlist3.C
index 029287b..f7b82ef 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-initlist3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-initlist3.C
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 int main()
 {
-  []{ return { 1, 2 }; }();	// { dg-error "initializer_list" }
+  []{ return { 1, 2 }; }();	// { dg-error "initializer.list" }
 }
 
 // { dg-prune-output "return-statement with a value" }

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-11 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-08 15:55 Jason Merrill
2013-03-11 16:20 ` Jason Merrill [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=513E0444.4040506@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).