From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27205 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2013 05:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27186 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2013 05:31:05 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:31:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2L5UxT1021511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:30:59 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-48.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.48]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2L5UwmG013839; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:30:58 -0400 Message-ID: <514A9B12.8050502@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:31:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aldy Hernandez CC: "Joseph S. Myers" , "Iyer, Balaji V" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean, independent patchset, take 1) References: <5149D62F.9070503@redhat.com> <5149E4C7.1090206@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5149E4C7.1090206@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00778.txt.bz2 On 03/20/2013 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > As I'd mentioned, you have .exp files named compile.exp and execute.exp > which seem to be causing ambiguity problems in parallel checks (make > check -jN). For some reason, with this patch, the rest of dg.exp fails > to run after Cilkplus' compile/execute.exp runs. Renaming these to > something less generic does the trick. Do you mind prefixing all the > .exp's with "cilkplus_" or something similar? > > [Perhaps someone can pontificate as to what the actual problem is here > and describe it. Dejagnu is a mystery to me.] I doubt it's anything really related to dejagnu and is more related to how the "make check" target is constructed in gcc/Makefile.in. It's brutally ugly. I recently had to swap in some dejagnu/tcl basics; and I did everything possible to forget it as soon as possible. I'd really forgotten how much I hated writing tcl code. Jeff