From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94165 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2017 13:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94150 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2017 13:59:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:59:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF382442; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXzNFDhgqKkE; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6162B82310; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:59:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Olivier Hainque Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Nathan Sidwell , Richard Biener , Jeff Law , De Rodat Pierre-Marie Subject: Re: [PATCH PR/82546] tree node size Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <5150018.uuBIJ9PHLo@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/3.16.7-53-desktop; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <6BD322E7-506B-4CB3-96CE-9CE12162D96F@adacore.com> References: <3e7ecb64-cd96-47a3-cb75-53e41317d90c@acm.org> <6BD322E7-506B-4CB3-96CE-9CE12162D96F@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg01175.txt.bz2 > I'd think so. LANG_TYPE is treated specially in several > places and Ada debug types are pretty sensitive so this would > require caution but I don't see/know-of obvious reasons why this > couldn't be done. LANG_TYPE is only used in Ada to trigger the specific treatment in gen_type_die_with_usage for DW_TAG_unspecified_type, so very minor. -- Eric Botcazou