From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11268 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2013 11:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11242 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2013 11:03:27 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:03:27 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Ulzsh-0005Jp-UA from Bernd_Schmidt@mentor.com ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:03:23 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:03:23 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:03:20 +0100 Message-ID: <51B5B272.7000006@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:03:00 -0000 From: Bernd Schmidt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130522 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Richard Henderson , Richard Biener , Jan Hubicka , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564) References: <20130607192540.GH1493@tucnak.redhat.com> <51B245EF.3080602@redhat.com> <51B5AF99.9000702@codesourcery.com> <20130610105535.GR1493@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130610105535.GR1493@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 On 06/10/2013 12:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:51:05PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> On 06/07/2013 10:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >>> But these I think require a good hard look to see if they really intended an >>> ABI alignment: >>> >>> c6x comment explicitly mentions abi >> >> The ABI specifies a minimum alignment for arrays. > > Thus after the patch c6x.h (DATA_ALIGNMENT) should be renamed to > DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT, right? I think so. Bernd