[Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Igor Zamyatin]

Hi!

This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
gcc-4.9/changes.html page.

OK to install?

Thanks,
Igor

 Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -c -1 -r1.17 changes.html
*** htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 6 Jun 2013 11:15:24 -0000       1.17
--- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 10 Jun 2013 10:11:24 -0000
***************
*** 177,178 ****
--- 177,185 ----

+ <h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
+   <ul>
+     <li> GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+       through <code>-march=slm</code>.
+     </li>
+   </ul>
+
  <h3 id="rx">RX</h3>

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Tobias Burnus]

Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> +     <li> GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
> +       through <code>-march=slm</code>.

Not related to the release notes, but I think it should also be added to 
gcc/doc/invoke.texi's "@item -march=@var{cpu-type}" - presumably after 
the item:

@item atom
Intel Atom CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3
instruction set support.


Tobias

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Igor Zamyatin]

Ping?

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
>
> OK to install?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
>  Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -c -1 -r1.17 changes.html
> *** htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 6 Jun 2013 11:15:24 -0000       1.17
> --- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 10 Jun 2013 10:11:24 -0000
> ***************
> *** 177,178 ****
> --- 177,185 ----
>
> + <h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
> +   <ul>
> +     <li> GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
> +       through <code>-march=slm</code>.
> +     </li>
> +   </ul>
> +
>   <h3 id="rx">RX</h3>

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.

Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".

Thanks,
Gerald

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Kirill Yukhin]

Hello,
>
> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
Checked int www CVS.

Thanks, K

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Chung-Ju Wu]

2013/6/25 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>>
>> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
> Checked int www CVS.
>
> Thanks, K

Hi, Kirill,

By reviewing webpage of gcc-4.9 changes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html

I noticed there is a duplicate subsection 'IA-32/x86-64'
under "New Targets and Target Specific Improvements".

According to the cvs log of changes.html, it is caused
by revision 1.19 that created another 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection.


===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html	2013/06/24 22:06:53	1.18
+++ wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html	2013/06/25 08:05:13	1.19
@@ -175,6 +175,13 @@

 <h2 id="targets">New Targets and Target Specific Improvements</h2>

+<h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
+  <ul>
+    <li> GCC now supports the new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+      through <code>-march=slm</code>.
+    </li>
+  </ul>
+
 <h3 id="x86">IA-32/x86-64</h3>
   <ul>
     <li> It is now possible to call x86 intrinsics from select functions in


I think that would be better to merge the content into
single 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection.
But I have no idea about the order of those two items.
Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the change? :-)


Best regards,
jasonwucj

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

[Kirill Yukhin]

On 7/2/2013 11:31 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> I think that would be better to merge the content into single
> 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those
> two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the
> change? :-)
Hi, thanks for pointing!
I think order of bullets doesn't matter too much. Fixed as obvious.

Thanks, K