From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sutton@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [c++-concepts] code review
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B73B97.1020200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANq5SyuP644euK+2H-HdrxCrM-Axj=543Td1qJXGuOo91ccf+g@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/11/2013 10:49 AM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
>>> After investigating, neither call_expr nor resolve_nondeduced_context
>>> do what I need. I need a resolution of a call expression that does not
>>> return overload sets, especially in the case where the initial call
>>> expression is already dependent.
>>
>> Does this have to do with restrictions on overloading of concept functions?
>
> Very much so. I need a single function because I'm inlining its body
> at the call site.
And you need to do this even when the call is type-dependent?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-28 14:07 [c++-concepts] Reserving new keywords for concepts Andrew Sutton
2013-02-28 14:51 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-02-28 15:01 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-02-28 15:11 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-02-28 15:54 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-02-28 15:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-06 15:55 ` [c++-concepts] code review Jason Merrill
2013-06-06 17:48 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-06 20:29 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-08 13:35 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-10 0:49 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-10 16:27 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-10 19:30 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-11 13:45 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-11 14:27 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-11 14:49 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-11 15:00 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2013-06-11 15:09 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-11 17:54 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-12 15:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-12 16:35 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-14 15:32 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-15 1:40 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-15 2:13 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-17 18:11 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-17 19:20 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-18 0:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-18 16:28 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-19 14:21 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-19 16:10 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-20 5:30 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-20 13:01 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-20 13:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-20 13:19 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-20 13:57 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-20 14:18 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-20 15:17 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-20 15:22 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-20 15:27 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-20 15:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-20 15:50 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-20 17:23 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-20 18:33 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-21 12:46 ` Andrew Sutton
2013-06-24 15:55 ` Jason Merrill
2013-06-20 15:20 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-09 20:34 ` Oleg Endo
2013-06-10 0:34 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2013-06-10 14:51 ` Diego Novillo
2013-06-10 22:51 ` Lawrence Crowl
2013-06-10 16:14 ` Jason Merrill
2015-05-01 18:32 Jason Merrill
2015-05-01 19:21 ` Andrew Sutton
2015-05-08 20:08 ` Andrew Sutton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B73B97.1020200@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.n.sutton@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).