From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-343825-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12470 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2013 10:07:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12460 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2013 10:07:47 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (HELO userp1040.oracle.com) (156.151.31.81)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:07:46 +0000
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93])	by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5IA7fNY017877	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:07:42 GMT
Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85])	by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5IA7hLd000099	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:07:44 GMT
Received: from abhmt102.oracle.com (abhmt102.oracle.com [141.146.116.54])	by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5IA7hIT000092;	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:07:43 GMT
Received: from poldo4.casa (/79.45.212.138)	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)	with ESMTP ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:07:43 -0700
Message-ID: <51C0316D.2030207@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:07:00 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
CC: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: PING [C++ docs patch] PR 56544
References: <51B2F1FD.2090600@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B2F1FD.2090600@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg01037.txt.bz2

Hi,

On 06/08/2013 10:57 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the bug reminds us to update the documentation about the value of 
> __cplusplus. I tentatively prepared the below, is it clear enough?
>
> We could probably apply something to the branch too, without the 
> -std=c++1y bits, thus end simply like '; or @code{201103L}, per the 
> 2011 C++ standard' or more verbosely say that with -std=c++1y too the 
> value is 201103L.
Is this patch straightforward enough to go in? Opinions about the branch?

Thanks...
Paolo.