From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-344175-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32458 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2013 15:55:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32447 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jun 2013 15:55:22 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:55:21 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5OFtJL6002974	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:55:19 -0400
Received: from [10.3.113.51] (ovpn-113-51.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.51])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5OFtIAw013266;	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:55:19 -0400
Message-ID: <51C86BE6.2090902@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:55:00 -0000
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/23.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sutton@gmail.com>
CC: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@axiomatics.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [c++-concepts] code review
References: <CANq5Syt5s-NgazOYbT5wtYSRsbZUqcivoer1w4jiucx5qYKMfA@mail.gmail.com> <51B8A36C.1080005@redhat.com> <CANq5SyuWOKxWshSBb8uxtN8d6HMgifJdDcQSrsSwazRjE=v2NQ@mail.gmail.com> <51BBC613.5040708@redhat.com> <CANq5SysgoJ0nVdrqLMjFqaWcmz97dB03qbKCs_ZpoBS+OVYzfg@mail.gmail.com> <51BF617D.3080101@redhat.com> <CANq5SyshsCtsQgGvCj6hVexa4m-st0-yM1PpLq=R68YXkfz_aw@mail.gmail.com> <51C1BE59.6040400@redhat.com> <CAAiZkiDBrBMhRf-6w6dH1Yh7m6pOoJFEor38mcWKgtbzVXLhVA@mail.gmail.com> <51C2FD43.8090209@redhat.com> <87bo716ia0.fsf@euclid.axiomatics.org> <CANq5SysuEbi34bd-05JsyiM4quYt7LevLd=zXinxvFAhnvEXGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C30A3C.2040907@redhat.com> <CANq5SyssNx96LxY2fe7_8QHVLCit2GMT3euZ4XJP2Z8Yx9cJaA@mail.gmail.com> <51C31CEA.2040208@redhat.com> <CANq5SysxuOU+uUEQHtECDdc3w60ubpr8DKqy+Z1qs4ki_RgX1A@mail.gmail.com> <51C33A9D.60804@redhat.com> <51C34AFD.4050008@redhat.com> <CANq5Syv6tbas9JviLMK_AsYs99U3maXu1P-tF4KK4tf1XWu7sA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANq5Syv6tbas9JviLMK_AsYs99U3maXu1P-tF4KK4tf1XWu7sA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg01387.txt.bz2

On 06/21/2013 08:46 AM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
> I can move those patches over to git and push the changes in separate
> branches in addition to the usual submission mechanism. Would that be
> appropriate? Can I create a bunch of different git branches for small
> feature sets?

Sure, that sounds fine.

Jason