* [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
@ 2013-06-10 10:13 Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-10 11:16 ` Tobias Burnus
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Igor Zamyatin @ 2013-06-10 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
Hi!
This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
OK to install?
Thanks,
Igor
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -c -1 -r1.17 changes.html
*** htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 6 Jun 2013 11:15:24 -0000 1.17
--- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 10 Jun 2013 10:11:24 -0000
***************
*** 177,178 ****
--- 177,185 ----
+ <h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
+ <ul>
+ <li> GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+ through <code>-march=slm</code>.
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+
<h3 id="rx">RX</h3>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013-06-10 10:13 [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture Igor Zamyatin
@ 2013-06-10 11:16 ` Tobias Burnus
2013-06-18 10:08 ` Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-24 0:09 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Burnus @ 2013-06-10 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Igor Zamyatin; +Cc: gcc-patches, Gerald Pfeifer
Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> + <li> GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
> + through <code>-march=slm</code>.
Not related to the release notes, but I think it should also be added to
gcc/doc/invoke.texi's "@item -march=@var{cpu-type}" - presumably after
the item:
@item atom
Intel Atom CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3
instruction set support.
Tobias
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013-06-10 10:13 [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-10 11:16 ` Tobias Burnus
@ 2013-06-18 10:08 ` Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-24 0:09 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Igor Zamyatin @ 2013-06-18 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
Ping?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
>
> OK to install?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -c -1 -r1.17 changes.html
> *** htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 6 Jun 2013 11:15:24 -0000 1.17
> --- htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 10 Jun 2013 10:11:24 -0000
> ***************
> *** 177,178 ****
> --- 177,185 ----
>
> + <h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
> + <ul>
> + <li> GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
> + through <code>-march=slm</code>.
> + </li>
> + </ul>
> +
> <h3 id="rx">RX</h3>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013-06-10 10:13 [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-10 11:16 ` Tobias Burnus
2013-06-18 10:08 ` Igor Zamyatin
@ 2013-06-24 0:09 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2013-06-25 8:07 ` Kirill Yukhin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2013-06-24 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Igor Zamyatin; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
Thanks,
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013-06-24 0:09 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2013-06-25 8:07 ` Kirill Yukhin
2013-07-02 7:32 ` Chung-Ju Wu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kirill Yukhin @ 2013-06-25 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Igor Zamyatin, gcc-patches List
Hello,
>
> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
Checked int www CVS.
Thanks, K
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013-06-25 8:07 ` Kirill Yukhin
@ 2013-07-02 7:32 ` Chung-Ju Wu
2013-07-02 7:50 ` Kirill Yukhin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chung-Ju Wu @ 2013-07-02 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kirill Yukhin; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, Sriraman Tallam, gcc-patches List
2013/6/25 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>>
>> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
> Checked int www CVS.
>
> Thanks, K
Hi, Kirill,
By reviewing webpage of gcc-4.9 changes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html
I noticed there is a duplicate subsection 'IA-32/x86-64'
under "New Targets and Target Specific Improvements".
According to the cvs log of changes.html, it is caused
by revision 1.19 that created another 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection.
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 2013/06/24 22:06:53 1.18
+++ wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html 2013/06/25 08:05:13 1.19
@@ -175,6 +175,13 @@
<h2 id="targets">New Targets and Target Specific Improvements</h2>
+<h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
+ <ul>
+ <li> GCC now supports the new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+ through <code>-march=slm</code>.
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+
<h3 id="x86">IA-32/x86-64</h3>
<ul>
<li> It is now possible to call x86 intrinsics from select functions in
I think that would be better to merge the content into
single 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection.
But I have no idea about the order of those two items.
Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the change? :-)
Best regards,
jasonwucj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture
2013-07-02 7:32 ` Chung-Ju Wu
@ 2013-07-02 7:50 ` Kirill Yukhin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kirill Yukhin @ 2013-07-02 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chung-Ju Wu; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, Sriraman Tallam, gcc-patches List
On 7/2/2013 11:31 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> I think that would be better to merge the content into single
> 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those
> two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the
> change? :-)
Hi, thanks for pointing!
I think order of bullets doesn't matter too much. Fixed as obvious.
Thanks, K
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-02 7:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-10 10:13 [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-10 11:16 ` Tobias Burnus
2013-06-18 10:08 ` Igor Zamyatin
2013-06-24 0:09 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2013-06-25 8:07 ` Kirill Yukhin
2013-07-02 7:32 ` Chung-Ju Wu
2013-07-02 7:50 ` Kirill Yukhin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).