* [PING] Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/54537
@ 2013-07-31 20:14 Peter Bergner
2013-08-01 9:34 ` Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Bergner @ 2013-07-31 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabien Chêne; +Cc: gcc-patches
Hi Fabien,
Can you tell me what the status of the following patch that
removes the pow() overload from tr1 is? Specifically:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html
It seemed to have been approved and you were going to do some
additional testing before committing the patch last November,
but the patch still hasn't been committed yet.
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING] Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/54537
2013-07-31 20:14 [PING] Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/54537 Peter Bergner
@ 2013-08-01 9:34 ` Paolo Carlini
2013-08-01 19:42 ` Peter Bergner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2013-08-01 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Bergner; +Cc: Fabien Chêne, gcc-patches
Hi,
On 07/31/2013 10:01 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Hi Fabien,
>
> Can you tell me what the status of the following patch that
> removes the pow() overload from tr1 is? Specifically:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html
>
> It seemed to have been approved and you were going to do some
> additional testing before committing the patch last November,
> but the patch still hasn't been committed yet.
Peter, please build & test the patch once more and commit it and close
the bug.
Thanks,
Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING] Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/54537
2013-08-01 9:34 ` Paolo Carlini
@ 2013-08-01 19:42 ` Peter Bergner
2013-08-02 2:32 ` Peter Bergner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Bergner @ 2013-08-01 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini
Cc: Fabien Chêne, gcc-patches, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Biener
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 11:33 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 10:01 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Can you tell me what the status of the following patch that
> > removes the pow() overload from tr1 is? Specifically:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html
> >
> > It seemed to have been approved and you were going to do some
> > additional testing before committing the patch last November,
> > but the patch still hasn't been committed yet.
> Peter, please build & test the patch once more and commit it and close
> the bug.
The patch needed a small change to the expected error message in using9.C to
get it to pass, otherwise, it passed bootstrap and regtesting with no errors.
Patch committed to mainline as revision 201414 and the bug closed.
Thanks.
Jakub & richi,
This bug also affects GCC 4.8. Is it appropriate to backport this patch
to the FSF 4.8 branch? I can bootstrap and regtest it there too before
committing if you think it's ok.
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING] Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/54537
2013-08-01 19:42 ` Peter Bergner
@ 2013-08-02 2:32 ` Peter Bergner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Bergner @ 2013-08-02 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini
Cc: Fabien Chêne, gcc-patches, Jakub Jelinek, Richard Biener
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 14:42 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Jakub & richi,
>
> This bug also affects GCC 4.8. Is it appropriate to backport this patch
> to the FSF 4.8 branch? I can bootstrap and regtest it there too before
> committing if you think it's ok.
FYI, I tested the patch on the FSF 4.8 branch and it bootstraps
and regtests with no regressions.
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-02 2:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-31 20:14 [PING] Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/54537 Peter Bergner
2013-08-01 9:34 ` Paolo Carlini
2013-08-01 19:42 ` Peter Bergner
2013-08-02 2:32 ` Peter Bergner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).