From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92B03858413 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 02:12:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B92B03858413 Received: from mail-qv1-f70.google.com (mail-qv1-f70.google.com [209.85.219.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-446-i3yJRFzVOEuPhJ5cb_drcQ-1; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:12:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: i3yJRFzVOEuPhJ5cb_drcQ-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f70.google.com with SMTP id l4-20020a0cc204000000b00435ac16d67cso5361243qvh.12 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:12:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ofCe9m/XE411NL5lOpNX9LyDEDLi3ECd195fhntxdmE=; b=cA/sQdgjGjMquFJ47FL2uz+PtDHFmoVdhYyReHCtzhc93xiqtYV8De3uyeXdsDHkxj CEbKRnAy5TfjmzG7rYCGl3JuDGhAqNkgZiUrG3sldeuLwlu8PJNkdEMN6ssoOz6ZQElB 55d0ndDfyNIGgCfjNzHH4Kb1Iu95jNSOqfOG9MpnTc/kCa6KeqrOoNjGLWFGh38OIx2R 9S68Q7KVzBNAV/Tfj6szLLVuu0eSX3wu4p9VLMlwIDGZnlcsJMAJ12F3eIxz+YoejKo2 yC73bfFCLVDGqxm5w21DEHoYEC2hx+X0mhG+OK3+IATJhG7F2NitORaFQtsyqzM7vdDa VsUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338N0oOTnjBMZbV5MuIjcUtzmKKQEJwqA3060zxXyIg8y8yE+QV 5WkiOARTVwSw4VBt75x6EANLie47CtvtBjMaaKBTsFsugSckwt149PRdb3WuZNXrDrBpmcrIv/Z PyC4g1f1WpyBXYSOwRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2488:b0:67b:a6a6:b201 with SMTP id i8-20020a05620a248800b0067ba6a6b201mr4444388qkn.580.1647569558705; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:12:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPe02sY/qOZhCbT6ysFRF9ySOibRvM7OS4pEfCySXGV5o19wD82qoOO4gGX76fqVYTHUMKAQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2488:b0:67b:a6a6:b201 with SMTP id i8-20020a05620a248800b0067ba6a6b201mr4444380qkn.580.1647569558487; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2607:fea8:a262:5f00::9b6f? ([2607:fea8:a262:5f00::9b6f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 145-20020a370897000000b0067b30c65415sm3260234qki.75.2022.03.17.19.12.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51deaf19-7016-e194-f163-d954a6ddaad3@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:12:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore (possible) signed zeros in operands of FP comparisons. To: Jeff Law , Roger Sayle , 'Richard Biener' , Jakub Jelinek Cc: 'GCC Patches' References: <001c01d837d9$4c8bf060$e5a3d120$@nextmovesoftware.com> <009701d83843$26293a30$727bae90$@nextmovesoftware.com> From: Andrew MacLeod In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_SHORT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 02:12:44 -0000 On 3/17/22 19:27, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On 3/15/2022 2:03 AM, Roger Sayle wrote: > > >> >> Speaking of tree-ssa passes that could be improved, I was wondering >> whether >> you could review my EVRP patch to fix regression PR/102950. Pretty >> please? >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/589569.html > > I forwarded this to Aldy & Andrew.  I suspect they missed it. > > I saw it originally, and was happy to not have to figure out the bits myself :-)  The more people pitching in to range-ops the better!! I'm certainly fine with it, but the gory details of the bit twiddling it beyond my scope of expertise. Figured Jakub or richi were better shots at that part. Andrew