From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21750 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2013 06:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21739 invoked by uid 89); 15 Oct 2013 06:27:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ea0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ea0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:27:11 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m14so3786852eaj.20 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:27:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.219.198 with SMTP id m46mr61882772eep.41.1381818428103; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (net-37-116-196-7.cust.dsl.vodafone.it. [37.116.196.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k7sm162550616eeg.13.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <525CE038.1040406@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:57:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130923 Thunderbird/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer CC: Tom Tromey , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/20] add configury References: <1379945520-3839-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1379945520-3839-5-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <52492C0A.4030505@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg01023.txt.bz2 Il 15/10/2013 00:28, Gerald Pfeifer ha scritto: > - The problem is not actually the set of flags being used. On a > different tester clang is the bootstrap compiler, and this is > also the one invoked for `gmake install`. If anything, shouldn't > the just built compiler be used _if_ anything is left to compile? Yes---but then, the question remains as to why anything is built at all. Paolo