From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28077 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2013 19:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28063 invoked by uid 89); 25 Oct 2013 19:04:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:04:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9PJ4g7W001336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:04:42 -0400 Received: from [10.10.116.17] ([10.10.116.17]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9PJ4fh3021898; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:04:41 -0400 Message-ID: <526AC0C9.1050003@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:30:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marek Polacek CC: GCC Patches , Jakub Jelinek , "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: [PATCH][ubsan] Add VLA bound instrumentation References: <20130912122655.GN23899@redhat.com> <20130925124132.GJ12296@redhat.com> <52697B9D.9000502@redhat.com> <20131025165803.GF27400@redhat.com> <526AB5CC.60408@redhat.com> <20131025190356.GG27400@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20131025190356.GG27400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg02203.txt.bz2 On 10/25/2013 03:03 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:17:48PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >> I think the right place to handle both ubsan and c++1y VLA checks is >> in compute_array_index_type, in the block where we're calling >> variable_size. > > I'm sorry, you want me to move the c++1y VLA check into > compute_array_index_type, or just do the ubsan instrumentation in > there? Thanks, Both. Jason