From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6539 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2013 13:23:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6530 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2013 13:23:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RDNS_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:23:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7DNmQP013258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:23:48 -0500 Received: from [10.10.55.26] (vpn-55-26.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.55.26]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7DNl9u002288; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:23:47 -0500 Message-ID: <527B9462.4040305@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew MacLeod User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Basile Starynkevitch CC: gcc-patches , Richard Biener , Jeff Law , Diego Novillo Subject: Re: [patch] Create gimple-expr..[ch] ... was Re: RFC: gimple.[ch] break apart References: <5271CBF9.2070005@redhat.com> <52791C46.6090909@redhat.com> <20131107103646.GA26387@ours.starynkevitch.net> In-Reply-To: <20131107103646.GA26387@ours.starynkevitch.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00762.txt.bz2 On 11/07/2013 05:36 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote: >> I decided to name the new file gimple-expr.[ch] instead of >> gimple-decl.... This will eventually split into gimple-type.[ch], >> gimple-decl.[ch], and gimple-expr.[ch]. > > Since we are adding *new* C++ files, can't we please name them *.cc > for the implementation part, so at least create gimple-expr.h and > gimple-expr.cc but not gimple-expr.c, please! Assuming we put this into stage 1 next year, I would imagine we'd rename a number of things, including .cc, drop the tree-* from the tree-ssa-blah.[c]h files, etc etc. There have been a few things people have suggested renaming... I think if we do renaming, they ought to be all at one time to minimize the pain. At the moment, the new gimple-* files I'm creating are still C, so they are .c files... Andrew