From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-355493-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1196 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2013 18:40:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1172 invoked by uid 89); 20 Nov 2013 18:40:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx01.qsc.de
Received: from Unknown (HELO mx01.qsc.de) (213.148.129.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:40:56 +0000
Received: from archimedes.net-b.de (port-92-194-223-135.dynamic.qsc.de [92.194.223.135])	by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09003CBE0;	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:40:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <528D022E.4040005@net-b.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:30:00 -0000
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Philippe Baril Lecavalier <pbl.ltx@gmail.com>,  GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
CC: gerald@pfeifer.com, Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Broken links
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311192052400.15744@zardoz.site>	<528C6085.9090905@net-b.de>	<CAKQMxzTY9OoE7DR_NjCo23DHdc8-BvvgfF6+HZNavzpdsSqXEg@mail.gmail.com> <CABu4Xf5po3_aa=dbEV3c05kotSGdrK9X8xrqzOoTsT=-PWmmWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABu4Xf5po3_aa=dbEV3c05kotSGdrK9X8xrqzOoTsT=-PWmmWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02592.txt.bz2

Am 20.11.2013 16:45, schrieb Philippe Baril Lecavalier:
> Embarrassing typos, my apologies. I was told to specify that I don't 
> have commit access, but since this mention is irrelevant, I modified 
> my suggested notice in about.html to reflect that. See attached.

Well, stating that one doesn't have commit access is useful. Thus with:

"<li> Mention the fact that you do not have commit access"

I was perfectly happy. I was mainly struggling with what followed those 
words:

"(why you do this)."

First, I don't quite understand the meaning of the second part. 
Secondly, one meaning I can read into it is misleading. Just removing 
the "(…)" would be fine with me

Anyway, I leave the wordsmithing to Gerald and you.

Tobias